3001 The Final Odyssey

May 16, 2007

Specifications

Clark, Arthur, 3001 The Final Odyssey, Ballantine Books, New York, 1997.

Reading

This was read from 01/01/2007 to 01/11/2007. The book was from the library.

Review

This book is the last of Arthur Clark's series that started with 2001 in 1968. To be honest, I am somewhat disappointed in this book, which is saying a lot because I like most of Arthur Clark's book up through Rama.

This book is really three pretty much independent stories combined in one book. The first story is about finding Frank Poole in 3001. (It should be noted that the 2001 series of events is transferred to a later date. That is, Frank Poole is given a birth date in 1997.) Then the story continues with his adaptation to the society in 3001.

He has two things to adapt to. First, the changes in society, and technology. Second, the fact that he is viewed as a relic of a former era, a really bad era at that. The real problem with this part of the book is that it gets too caught up in the technological differences, and doesn't concentrate on story. The result is rather boring. I get the feeling that Clark felt the same way, so he ended it and started into part two.

I disagree with some of the technology changes, because he fails to take into account limits on technology. For example, he pushes the orbital elevator idea, which is great on paper, but I doubt anything will ever exist that could withstand the pressures - both that which would be needed for the building (imagine a rope 23,000 miles long - it would be too long to hold together.) Also, the "braincap" which he presumes could be used. Yet, placing anything on the surface of the brain to try to determine what is going on inside has been compared to trying to spy on a top secret computer installation by holding something outside the outer fence. He also talks about an energy source which gets it energy from the instantaneous creation and destruction of electron-positron pairs. I disagree with a the theory, therefore the technology. It sounds good on paper, but is not so good in practice.

He also assumes a monotonic improvement in technology. I think, and I know that Alvin Toffler has said it as well, that the age of technology is coming to an end. That is, we are at a state where the forces which appose technological progress are outweighing those which advance it. That is part of the reason I don't have a job right now.

Also, Clarke comes out with a very anti-religion stance. Yet one cannot escape religion - even those people who say they have none have a religion, since religion basically is the starting point of logic. There is no logic without axioms, no life without religion.

The problem of religion is that it has been used in the past to promote ignorance, and to enslave the masses. I'm not sure but what that might mostly be a western phenomenon, however. Also, I have some question about whether this is really an aspect of religion, or of human nature. That is, if the idiots that use religion to placate the masses (by the way, Communism is a religion) would have used any tool available to accomplish that task. Similarly, wars that are undertaken for "religious" reasons.

In part two, Poole goes to Ganymede, a moon of Jupiter, now called "Lucifer." One fact I find questionable is why the name was changed, and why the people of 3001 have any trouble with it. Poole could, but people in 3001 know what Jupiter refers to. Of the three stories, this is the best. Basically, it consists of Poole going to Ganymede, then Europa, where an alien life form is living. Poole gambles that Bowman, or what was Bowman, would allow him to land, where it had not allowed others. He lands, and explores a bit of what happened to Bowman, and Hal, who are now simulations in the gigantic computer that is the monoliths.

The book would have been improved if this part had been expanded, and the first part contracted. This doesn't spend so much time speculating on what the future will be like, but more time on the story.

The third part is about a "war." Here it is revealed that the "headquarters" for the monoliths is 450 light years away. The distance is significant. The monoliths themselves are automatons, with no independent thoughts. They are starting to fall apart, having been here for millions of years. The problem is that the creatures that created the monoliths have seen what happened in the book 2001 (now probably taking place more like 2050) and the response is just now reaching the Solar system. This is some thirty years after the first two parts. Poole and the other people who monitor the Europa situation are made aware of the danger because of Bowman. Bowman expects the worst - that the masters will try to terminate their experiment.

I don't think Clark could think of a good response, after all, how does one attack the unattackable. Therefore, he has them getting old computer viruses from the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Being a computer expert, he shows a misunderstanding of computers. That is, a computer virus will attack only Windows computers. Certainly one that works on Windows will not work on Linux, etc. (Although the one that brought down the Internet in 1987 was set up to work on three machines - it actually had a bug in one, so it only worked on two types of computers.) The point being that the viruses would not work on the computer in the monolith because it wouldn't be set up to run the code. Similarly, he has mathematicians trying to create viruses that get a computer into an infinite loop trying to do something (akin to when Captain Kirk [or was it Spock] disabled the computer on the Enterprise by telling it to calculate PI exactly). The problem is that computers since the 1960's have been set up to kick off programs that take too long, or that use too many resources. True, Windows, and even Linux doesn't worry about it too much right now, but Linux, at least, could.

I think the third story has some potential, but I don't think it is realized.


Contact the Author